Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2009
Volume: 8
Issue: 7
Page No. 1455 - 1460

Occurrence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Salmonella Serotypes in Apparently Healthy Slaughtered Sheep in Van, Turkey

Authors : Abdulbaki Aksakal , Banur Boynukara , Hasan Solmaz , Ziya Ilhan , Ismail Kutlu and Timur Gulhan

Abstract: This study was conducted to investigate the occurrence of Salmonella sp. and to determine their susceptibility to antibiotics in apparently healthy slaughtered sheep. In this research, a total of 600 (300 rectal and 300 vaginal) swabs taken from sheep were used as materials. A total of 9 (1.5%) Salmonella sp. were isolated from samples. Of the 9 Salmonella sp., 6 (2%) were isolated from rectal swabs and 3 (1%) Salmonella serotypes from vaginal swabs. Salmonella strains were serotyped as Salmonella saintpaul. All Salmonella strains were found to be susceptible to ampicillin, enrofloxacin, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, gentamicin, neomycin, chloramphenicol, spectinomycin, cephalothin, amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, trimethoprim+ sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid and penicillin G (except 2 isolates) whereas, they were resistant to erythromycin and novobiocin. This is the first time, S. saintpaul was isolated in rectal and vaginal swab samples of the sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Turkey.

How to cite this article:

Abdulbaki Aksakal , Banur Boynukara , Hasan Solmaz , Ziya Ilhan , Ismail Kutlu and Timur Gulhan , 2009. Occurrence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Salmonella Serotypes in Apparently Healthy Slaughtered Sheep in Van, Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8: 1455-1460.

INTRODUCTION

Salmonella strains belonged to the Enterobacteriaceae family are most commonly found in nature. These organisms are Gram-negative facultative anaerobic bacilli of the genus Salmonella and they are most heterogeneous group of Gram-negative bacteria. The genus Salmonella includes into 2 groups as Salmonella enterica and Salmonella bongori. S. bongori group includes less commonly observed serovars (<10), while S. enterica group covers >2.500 remaining serovars. Salmonella are classified into serogroups according to their somatic antigens (O) and serovars according to their flagellar (H) antigens (Le Minor, 1984; Holt et al., 1994; Brenner et al., 2000).

Salmonella strains cause infections both in humans and animals. Among these S. abortus ovis results in abortions in sheep, whereas certain Salmonella strains (S. typhimurium, S. enteritidis, S. newport, S. anatum, S. infantis etc.) cause diarrheal diseases (Holt et al., 1994; Hjartardottir et al., 2002; Kudaka et al., 2006). S. abortus ovis is mostly responsible for infections resulting in abortions in sheep while, S. dublin, S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium have also been isolated from certain animals experiencing abortions (Plagemann, 1989; Hjartardottir et al., 2002). Possible causes for the occurrence of infections resulting from Salmonella are inclusion of infected sheep to the flocks, use of contaminated feed and water, wild birds, other animals and human movements. Apparently healthy animals can act as reservoirs, the source of infection is generally adult sheep, spread is reported to occur with the oral ingestion of feed and water contaminated by material like feces, aborted fetus, fetal membranes and vaginal discharges (Sandberg et al., 2002; Woldemariam et al., 2005). The causative agent localizes to the uterus, intestines, urinary bladder and gall bladder and is excreted via feces and urine (Linklater, 1991). If sufficient hygienic measures are not taken during slaughtering of the animals in abattoirs especially in critical control points, there is high risk for carcasses and internal organs to be contaminated with Salmonella and other pathogenic agents (Zweifel et al., 2004; Woldemariam et al., 2005).

It was informed that salmonellosis can be controlled with antimicrobial therapy (Molla et al., 2006). There are several number of studies related the detection of susceptibility of Salmonella strains isolated from different sources to different antimicrobial agents (Threlfall et al., 2003; Davies et al., 2004; Intorre et al., 2005; Molla et al., 2006).

In this study, we aimed at serotyping the isolated Salmonella strains from rectal and vaginal swab samples of sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Van and to test the antimicrobial resistance patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials were collected from 22 different sheep flocks, which represented 7.800 sheep. Three hundred rectal and 300 vaginal swab samples from apparently healthy sheep slaughtered in Van from February 2006 to May 2006.

Isolation and identification of Salmonella: Rectal and vaginal swabs obtained from the sheep were first placed into previously prepared and numbered tubes containing 10 mL of Buffered Peptone Water (BPW, Oxoid) and were immediately transferred to the laboratory under cold chain. For preliminary enrichment, rectal and vaginal swabs were incubated in BPW at 37°C for 18-24 h. At the end of this period, the culture media were well mixed with vortex, 0.1 mL of broth was inoculated into Rappaport Vassiliadis Enrichment Broth (Oxoid), this was incubated at 42°C for 24-48 h. Following the incubation, the media were well agitated with vortex, a loop full of culture was obtained to be inoculated onto Salmonella Shigella Agar (Oxoid) with streak method and was incubated at 37°C for 18-24 h. Suspect Salmonella colonies were confirmed biochemically and serologically, after which they were serotyped (Holt et al., 1994; Carter et al., 1995; Aksakal, 2003; Sandberg et al., 2003).

Serotyping: The strains that were considered to be Salmonella depending on their biochemical characteristics were further tested with Salmonella polivalent anti O serum (Salmonella O Antiserum Poly A-I and Vi, Becton, Dickens and Co. Sparks, MD, USA) according to test instructions. Positively reacting strains were identified as Salmonella, further serogrouping and serotyping was carried out by using polivalent and monovalent O and H antisera (Refik Saydam National Hygiene Center, Ankara, Turkey and Statens Serum Institut, Hillerod, Denmark) according to Kauffmann-White scheme in National Reference Laboratory for Enteric Pathogens, Communicable Diseases Research Department in Refik Saydam National Hygiene Center (Popoff, 2001).

Antibiotic susceptibility testing: Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using a disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar (Merck) as previously described according to the standards outlined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). The antibiotic discs contained the following antimicrobial agents: gentamicin (Bioanalyse, 10 μg), neomycin (Bioanalyse, 30 μg), tetracycline (Bioanalyse, 30 μg), oxytetracycline (Oxoid, 30 μg), enrofloxacin (Bioanalyse, 5 μg), nalidixic acid (Oxoid, 30 μg), ampicillin (Bioanalyse, 10 μg), amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (Oxoid, 30 μg), penicillin G (Oxoid, 10 IU), eritromycin (Bioanalyse, 15 μg), trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole (Bioanalyse, 25 μg), spectinomycin (Bioanalyse, 100 μg), cephalothin (Oxoid, 30 μg), novobiocin (Oxoid, 30 μg) and chloramphenicol (Bioanalyse, 30 μg). Resistance was determined according to reference zone diameter interpretive standards (NCCLS, 2000).

Statistical analyses: The statistically significant differences among the rates of Salmonella isolation between rectal and vaginal swabs was calculated with chi-square (χ2) test (Sumbuloglu and Sumbuloglu, 1997).

RESULTS

Isolation and identification: From a total of 600 swabs (300 rectal, 300 vaginal) 9 (1.5%) Salmonella strains were isolated and identified (Table 1).

Six Salmonella strains were isolated and identified from rectal swabs (6/300) and 3 from vaginal swabs (3/300) (Table 1). All the isolates were obtained from rectal and vaginal swabs pertaining to different animals.

The rate of Salmonella isolation was identified as 2% for rectal swabs (6/300) and 1% for vaginal swabs (3/300). The difference between the isolation rates was not statistically significant (p>0.05; χ2).

Serotyping: All of the strains isolated from rectal and vaginal swabs were identified to be B serogroup Salmonella saintpaul (Table 1).

Antibiotic susceptibility testing: All of the isolated strains were susceptible to ampicillin, enrofloxacin, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, gentamicin, neomycin, chloramphenicol, spectinomycin, cephalotin, amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid, trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole and nalidixic acid and they were resistant to erythromycin and novobiocin.


Table 1: Salmonella serotypes of isolated from rectal and vaginal swabs by sample type

Table 2: Antimicrobial susceptibility among 9 S. saintpaul isolated from sheep
*Susceptible, **Resistant

Two of the strains (rectal isolates No. 4 and 5) were resistant to penicillin G and others were susceptible (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

Salmonella infections in sheep influence animal health and animal breeding negatively as they result in significant economical losses. Moreover, certain Salmonella strains create an important public health problem by causing zoonoses. In the presence of factors like stress apparently healthy infected animals spread Salmonella to the environment with their feces. Thus, they act as reservoirs by spreading the causative agent to other animals and to the environment (Sandberg et al., 2003; Woldemariam et al., 2005; Molla et al., 2006). Presence of Salmonella strains in the feces of animals slaughtered in abattoirs creates an important source of contamination for carcasses and edible internal organs; unless sufficient hygienic measures are taken during slaughtering, there is high risk of contamination reported for carcasses and internal organs (Zweifel et al., 2004; Woldemariam et al., 2005). In recent years, the importance of zoonoses in diseases of food origin has increased due to the fact that apparently healthy animals act as reservoirs for causative pathogens and that there is high risk of contamination to carcasses and internal organs at the time of slaughtering at critical control points where hygienic measures are weak (Zweifel et al., 2004).

Gokcen and Erganis (1996), reported having isolated Salmonella at a rate of 1% from the intestinal contents of sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Izmir, Turkey. Genc (2000), reported having isolated Salmonella at a rate of 2% from the intestinal contents of sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Kars, Turkey. Jethon (1990), obtained fecal samples from animals slaughtered in abattoirs and reported isolating Salmonella at a rate of 5.3%.

Sandberg et al. (2002), reported having isolated Salmonella at a rate of 0.8% in rectal swabs obtained from sheep in Norway. Zweifel et al. (2004), reported having isolated Salmonella in 11% of the fecal samples of the sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Switzerland. Davies et al. (2004), reported having isolated Salmonella in 0.1% of the fecal samples of the sheep slaughtered in the UK. Woldemariam et al. (2005), reported isolation of Salmonella in 2.1% of the fecal samples of the sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Ethiopia, in another study carried out in Ethiopia Molla et al. (2006), reported an isolation rate of 4.8% from feces of sheep.

In this study, Salmonella was isolated in 2% of the rectal swab samples. This rate is close to those reported by Gokcen and Erganis (1996), Genc (2000), Sandberg et al. (2003) and Woldemariam et al. (2005) while, being lower than those of Jethon (1990) and Molla et al. (2006) and higher than that reported by Davies et al. (2004). Having isolation rates that are both similar as well as high and low might be related to the differences in the regions the samples were obtained from and also to the differences in the isolation techniques. In this study, Salmonella was isolated in 1% of the vaginal swab samples. In the study, search we have carried out there was no mentioning of Salmonella isolation from vaginal swabs. When Salmonella isolation rates from rectal and vaginal swabs were compared, the difference between the two was not found to be statistically significant.

In studies carried out for the serovars isolated from sheep slaughtered in abattoirs different serovars were reported. Gokcen and Erganis (1996), reported having isolated S. typhimurium from the intestinal contents of the sheep slaughtered in Izmir, Turkey. Genc (2000), reported having isolated S. enteritidis from the intestinal contents of sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Kars, Turkey. Jethon (1990), Sandberg et al. (2003) and Zweifel et al. (2004), reported having isolated S. subspecies enterica IIIb 61: k:1,5,(7). Woldemariam et al. (2005), reported having isolated S. infantis and S. butantan from the feces of the sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Ethiopia. Molla et al. (2006), reported having isolated S. enteritidis, S. typhimurium, S. reading and S. heidelberg from the feces of sheep slaughtered in Ethiopia. In this study, Salmonella strains isolated from rectal and vaginal swab samples were serotyped as S. saintpaul. In the study, we have searched we have not come across any study regarding the isolation of S. saintpaul from rectal and vaginal swabs. This serovar has been isolated for the first time from rectal and vaginal swabs in Turkey.

Antibiotics have a widespread use for the treatment of bacterial infections in animals. However, irrational use of antibiotics results in bacteria developing resistance. Davies et al. (2004), reported that Salmonella strains they had identified from feces of animals slaughtered in abattoirs were sensitive to amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, neomycin, trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole and nalidixic acid. Threlfall et al. (2003), reported that Salmonella strains isolated from fecal samples were sensitive to nalidixic acid. Molla et al. (2006), identified that Salmonella strains isolated from feces of sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Ethiopia were susceptible to gentamicin, neomycin and nalidixic acid, whereas they were resistant to amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, cephalotin, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazol, spectinomycin and tetracycline. Intorre et al. (2005), reported that Salmonella strains isolated from sheep were resistant to penicillin and erythromycin. Kudaka et al. (2006), stated that S. saintpaul strains identified from chicken were resistant to tetracycline. All of the Salmonella strains isolated in this study were resistant to eritromycin and novobiocin while, they were susceptible to ampicillin, enrofloxazine, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, gentamicin, neomycin, chloramphenicol, amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid, cephalotin, trimethoprim + sulfamet-hoxazol, spectinomycin and nalidixic acid. Furthermore, 2 of the strains (isolates No. 4 and 5) were penicillin resistant whereas others were susceptible. Having different antimicrobial resistance patterns in the isolated Salmonella strains was related to differences in the serovars isolated and the differences in the regions they were isolated. This might be easily related to using the antibiotics without performing antimicrobial susceptibility test in those regions.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the presence of S. saintpaul in rectal and vaginal swab samples obtained from sheep in Van and its environs. This is the first time, S. saintpaul was isolated in rectal and vaginal swab samples of the sheep slaughtered in abattoirs in Turkey. The causative agent being isolated from rectal and vaginal swab samples is also important in demonstrating the fact that apparently healthy sheep might as well act as reservoirs.

When we take into account the fact that Salmonella serovars differ in countries and regions, we anticipate that the results obtained from this study will further contribute to the study to be performed at country wide for the identification of Salmonella profile. For the characterization of isolated Salmonella serovars detailed epidemiological and molecular studies are required. For preventing the development of further antimicrobial resistance, antibiotics should be administered at relevant doses for required period after taking into account the antimicrobial susceptibility test results. For minimizing the risk of Salmonella and other microorganism contamination to carcasses and internal organs in abattoirs attention should be paid to scrutinized use of hygienic measures.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by the Office for Scientific Research Projects of University of Yuzuncu Yil, Van- Turkey (Project No. 2005-VF-B05). We would like to thank Van Meat and Fish Institution (EBK) Slaughterhouse for giving us access to sampling and National Reference Laboratory for Enteric Pathogens, Communicable Diseases Research Department in Refik Saydam National Hygiene Center for serological typing of strains.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved