Abstract: The study deals with the questions concerning procedural guarantees of ensuring of the rights of individuals and companies at seizure of material evidence, money and values, samples for comparative survey. One studies the separate cases connected with seizure and storage of certain real evidences and also samples for comparative analyses: gene-biological materials, cash resources and others. One may indicate that there is an absence of clear legal regulation of procedural mechanism of seizure, arrest, storage of material evidences and samples for comparative analysis in spite of the amendments introduced to the legislation for specifics of procedures of destruction, realization and return of the seized articles and documents to legal owners. Under democratization of society of our country the seizure of separate objects during the conduct of investigative actions and, in particular, of seizure, requires reconsideration and the very procedure of investigative actions development and improvement. Not to a lesser extent it relates to the storage of material evidences and samples for comparative study. It seems possible to solve many considered above problems only by co-operative efforts of procedural scientists and criminalists and also practitioners.
Ramil R. Rakhmatullin, Konstantin D. Muratov and Anatoly N. Shalimov, 2015. Material Evidence and Samples for Comparative Study: Criminalistic and Procedural Problems of Seizure and Storage. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 10: 513-518.