Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2011
Volume: 10
Issue: 8
Page No. 955 - 958

Feeding Responses to Central Glutamatergic Receptor Agonist Administrations in Meat-Type Chicks

Authors : Takashi Bungo, Jun-Ichi Shiraishi and Shin-Ichi Kawakami

Abstract: The effects of Intra Cerebro Ventricular (ICV) injections of various glutamatergic receptor agonists were investigated using broiler chicks. ICV treatments with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA: a selective agonist of NMDA-subtype of glutamatergic ionotropic receptors) stimulated feeding behavior of chicks in a dose-dependent manner. On the other hand, ICV administration of kainate (a selective agonist of kainate-subtype of glutamatergic ionotropic receptors), AMPA (a selective agonist of AMPA-subtype of glutamatergic ionotropic receptors) or ACPD (a metabotropic glutamate agonist) did not affect feed intake in meat-type chicks. These findings indicated the involvement of glutamate as a chemical mediator in the regulation of feeding behavior in the meat-type chick, possibly acting on the central nervous system in this line through NMDA-sensitive glutamatergic receptor.

How to cite this article:

Takashi Bungo, Jun-Ichi Shiraishi and Shin-Ichi Kawakami, 2011. Feeding Responses to Central Glutamatergic Receptor Agonist Administrations in Meat-Type Chicks. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10: 955-958.

INTRODUCTION

Glutamate is the neurotransmitter occurring at most excitatory synapses in the mammalian brain (Brann, 1995; Pin and Duvoisin, 1995) which plays important roles in the formation of synapses and neuronal circuitry, long-term potentiation and depression and both normal learning and addictive behavior (Pelligrini-Giampetro et al., 1997; Wickelgren, 1998). Furthermore, glutamate was demonstrated to be an endogenous agent involved in the neural control of feed intake and body weight. Systemic, Intra Cerebro Ventricular (ICV) or local administration of glutamate can evoke a dose-related stimulation of feed intake in mammals (Reddy et al., 1986; Ritter and Stone, 1987; Wandji et al., 1989; Stricker-Krongrad et al., 1992; Stanley et al., 1993b). The action of glutamate is mediated by three distinct ionotropic receptor families, namely kainate, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionate (AMPA) and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors and by eight metabotropic receptors.

The hyperphagic effect of glutamate appears to be mediated by NMDA as well as by other excitatory amino acid receptor subtypes in mammals (Stanley et al., 1993a). Similar to mammalian systems, glutamate receptors are widely distributed in the avian central nervous system (Henley et al., 1989; Ottiger et al., 1995) and can be involved in learning and memory processes as well as in neuroendocrine control mechanisms (Jacquet et al., 1994; Riters and Bingman, 1994; Gruss and Braun, 1996). While the involvement of central glutamatergic mechanisms in the control of avian feeding behavior has been recently suggested, there are conflicting reports concerning such effects of glutamate (Zeni et al., 2000; Bungo et al., 2002; Da Silva et al., 2003; Zendehdel et al., 2009).

The aim of this present series of experiments was to examine the acute effect of central injection of various glutamate agonists on the feeding behavior in meat-type chicks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were purchased from a local hatchery (Fresh feeds, Ehime, Japan). The birds were maintained in a room with 24 h lighting and at a temperature of 30°C. They were given free access to a commercial starter diet (Nihon Nosan Kogyo Co. Ltd., Yokohama, Japan) and water during the pre-experimental period. The chicks were maintained in accordance with the recommendations of the NRC (1985). They were distributed into experimental groups based on their body weight so that the average body weight was as uniform as possible for each treatment. The birds were reared individually in experimental cages and had ad libitum access to feed up to the time of experiments.

Fig. 1: Effects of intracerebroventricular injections (10 μL) of the glutamatergic receptor agonists NMDA, KA, AMPA and ACPD on feed intake in ad libitum chicks. The number of chicks in each group was as follows: (NMDA) control, 6; 100 pmol, 6; 200 pmol, 5; 400 pmol, 5; (KA) control, 8; 10 pmol, 6; 20 pmol, 7; 40 pmol, 9; (AMPA) control, 8; 125 pmol, 7; 250 pmol, 6; 500 pmol, 7; (ACPD) control, 9; 125 pmol, 8; 250 pmol, 6; 500 pmol, 7. Data are expressed as means±SEM. *p<0.05 (Turkey-Kramer test) compared to control chicks

Birds (2 or 3 days old) fed ad libitum were given diet for 30 min immediately after treatment. Feed intake was determined by measuring the reduction of diet from a pre-weighed feeder.

The weight of feeders was measured using an electric digital balance of precision ±1 mg. N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), Kainate (KA), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl- 4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and (±) -1 Aminocyclopentane-trans-1, 3-dicarboxylic acid (ACPD) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). The drugs were dissolved in a 0.1% Evans blue solution which was prepared in 0.85% saline. Saline containing Evans blue was used as a control. The birds were Intra Cerebro Ventricularly (ICV) injected with the solutions (10 μL) using a microsyringe according to the methods used by Davis et al. (1979). Each chick was injected once only with saline or drug solution. The doses of agonists applied here were decided according to the preliminary trials that ascertained these doses of drugs had no effect on abnormal behavior (such as depression) in ad libitum chicks. At the end of the experiments, birds were sacrificed by decapitation after which the location of the injection site was confirmed. Data from the individuals that were not verified by the presence of Evans blue dye in the lateral ventricle were deleted. The numbers of birds used for data analysis are shown in Fig. 1. ANOVA was used to determine overall statistical significance due to treatment. When a treatment effect was significant, the Turkey-Kramer test was used to compare the significance among means. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Data were expressed as means±SEM.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Figure 1 shows the effects of ICV injection of glutamatergic receptor agonists (NMDA, KA, AMPA and ACPD) on feed intake at 30 min after the injection. The ICV injection of NMDA (100-400 pmol) caused a dose-dependent increase of feed intake in ad libitum broiler chicks (F [3,18] = 5.996, p<0.01). The higher level of NMDA (400 pmol) significantly induced feeding behavior (p<0.05). However all levels of KA (10-40 pmol), AMPA (125-500 pmol) or ACPD (125-500 pmol) failed to affect feeding behavior in the ad libitum meat-type chicks when compared with control treatment (p>0.1).

The results on the orexigenic effect of NMDA are in accordance with findings seen in rats (Stanley et al., 1993a). However in the same report, AMPA and KA also induced a drastic increase in feed intake of rats. The reason for the difference between rats and chicks is unclear. There is a hypothesis that the method (ICV injection) used in this study would influence other sites of the brain and that it is possible the stimulated sites may attenuate the orexigenic effect of AMPK or KA. Bungo et al. (2002) found that central glutamate elicits feeding and the present study showed that ICV administration of NMDA but not AMPA, KA and metabotropic glutamatergic receptor agonists, induces hyperphagia in broiler chicks (Fig. 1). These results collectively suggest that the orexigenic effect of glutamate in chicks may be mediated through the NMDA receptor in the central nervous system.

The present findings contrast with those obtained in pigeons indicating that glutamate or glutamatergic receptor agonist (NMDA or AMPA) injections can inhibit feeding (Zeni et al., 2000). Similar to the pigeon study, central glutamate has an anorexic effect in 5 weeks old broilers (Zendehdel et al., 2009). They indicated a possible explanation that the differential effects of glutamatergic receptor agonists in rats and birds might be due to species properties (Zendehdel et al., 2009). However, the same explanation may not apply to the results using neonatal chicks (Bungo et al., 2002) (Fig. 1). Discrepancy in the glutamatergic receptor agonist response among the reports in avians supports the hypothesis that the role of central glutamatergic circuits in the control of feeding behavior may alter with age. Further, research is needed to clarify the age related changes of neuronal circuits in chickens.

A recent study using mammals has provided evidence for a glutamatergic phenotype of neurons in the arcuate nucleus, a key site for the regulation of feeding in the central nervous system (Meister, 2007). The arcuate nucleus contains two neuronal populations (Neuropeptide Y (NPY)/agouti-related protein and pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC)/cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript) which integrate signals of nutritional status and influence energy homeostasis (Cone et al., 2001). Kiss et al. (2005) provided the evidence for the existence of glutaminergic innervation of NPY and POMC of the arcuate nucleus. In addition, considerable evidence has accumulated implicating glutamatergic system in the regulation of neuropeptide release (e.g., substance P: Caruso et al. (2006); orexin: Doane et al. (2007); melanin-concentrating hormone: Huang and van den Pol (2007)). Although, there is no report describing this relationship between glutamatergic system and these neuropeptides in chicks, it seemed that glutamate might modulate feed intake by excitatory effects on orexigenic and anorexigenic neurons of the arcuate nucleus in hypothalamus of chicks.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that central glutamate is involved in the central regulation of appetite via NMDA-sensitive glutamatergic receptor in meat-type chicks. Elucidation of the molecular mechanism behind the interplay between hypothalamic glutamatergic and peptidergic neurons needs further investigation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The researchers are grateful to Dr. L. M. Liao for proofreading the manuscript.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved