Research Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2010
Volume: 5
Issue: 6
Page No. 417 - 423

Three-Stage Procedure and Expected Opportunity Cost for Selecting a Good Simulated Design

Authors : Mohammad H. Almomani, Adam Baharum and Rosmanjawati Abdul Rahman

References

Almomani, M.H. and M.H. Alrefaei, 2010. A three-stage procedure for selecting a good enough simulated system. J. Applied Probab. Statist.

Alrefaei, M.H. and M.H. Almomani, 2007. Subset selection of best simulated systems. J. Franklin Inst., 344: 495-506.
CrossRef  |  

Bechhofer, R.E., T.J. Santner and D.M. Goldsman, 1995. Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening and Multiple Comparisons. Wiley, New York.

Chick, S.E. and K. Inoue, 2001. New procedures for identifying the best simulated system using common random numbers. Manage. Sci., 47: 1133-1149.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Chick, S.E. and K. Inoue, 2001. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Operat. Res., 49: 732-743.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Chick, S.E. and Y. Wu, 2005. Selection procedures with frequentist expected opportunity cost bounds. Operat. Res., 53: 867-878.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Goldsman, D. and B.L. Nelson, 1994. Ranking, selection and multiple comparisons in computer simulation. Proceedings of the Conference on Winter Simulation, (WS`94), Lake Buena Vista, USA., pp: 92-199.

Gupta, S.S. and K.J. Miescke, 1994. Bayesian look ahead one stage sampling allocations for selecting the largest normal mean. Statist. Pap., 35: 169-177.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Gupta, S.S. and K.J. Miescke, 1996. Bayesian look ahead one-stage sampling allocations for selection of the best population. J. Stat. Plann. Inference, 54: 229-244.
CrossRef  |  

Gupta, S.S., 1965. On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules. Technometrics, 7: 225-245.
Direct Link  |  

He, D., S.E. Chick and C.H. Chen, 2007. Opportunity cost and OCBA selection procedures in ordinal optimization for a fixed number of alternative systems. IEEE Trans. Syst., 37: 951-961.
CrossRef  |  

Ho, Y.C., R.S. Sreenivas and P. Vakili, 1992. Ordinal optimization of DEDS. J. Discrete Event Dyn. Syst., 2: 61-88.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kim, S.H. and B.L. Nelson, 2006. Selecting the Best System. In: Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Kim, S.H. and B. Nelson (Eds.)., Chapter 17, Elsevier, Oxford, pp: 501.

Kim, S.H. and B.L. Nelson, 2007. Recent advances in ranking and selection. Proc. Winter Simulat. Conf., 15: 150-160.

Nelson, B.L., J. Swann, D. Goldsman and W. Song, 2001. Simple procedures for selecting the best simulated system when the number of alternatives is large. Operat. Res., 49: 950-963.
Direct Link  |  

Rinott, Y., 1978. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Commun. Statist. Theory Methods, 7: 799-811.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sullivan, D.W. and J.R. Wilson, 1989. Restricted subset selection procedures for simulation. Operat. Res., 37: 52-71.
Direct Link  |  

Tamhane, A.C. and R.E. Bechhofer, 1977. A two-stage minimax procedure with screening for selecting the largest normal mean. Commun. Statist. Theory Methods, 6: 1003-1033.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Wilcox, R.R., 1984. A table for Rinott`s selection procedure. J. Qual. Technol., 16: 97-100.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved