References

Alkazemi, E., 2003. The effect of the instructional sequence of a computer simulation and a traditional laboratory on middle grade students' conceptual understanding of an electrochemistry topic. Ph. D Thesis, University of Florida.

Ariffin, T.F.B.T., 2005. Gender differences in computer attitudes and skills. J. Pendidikan Malaysia, 30: 75-91.
Direct Link  |  

Aripin, R., Z. Mahmood, R. Rohaizad, U. Yeop and M. Anuar, 2008. Students' learning styles and academic performance. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual SAS Malaysia Forum, July 15, 2008, Kuala Lumpur Convention Center, pp: 1-9.

Atkinson, R.K., 2002. Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. J. Educ. Psychol., 94: 416-427.
Direct Link  |  

Baylor, A.L. and Y. Kim, 2004. Pedagogical agent design: The impact of agent realism, gender, ethnicity and instructional role. Intell. Tutoring Syst., 3220: 268-270.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Baylor, A.L., 2004. Designing pedagogical agents to address diversity in learning. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1149126.1149210.

Baylor, A.L., 2005. The impact of pedagogical agent image on affective outcomes. ACM Press, 32306: 1-6.
Direct Link  |  

Baylor, A.L., J. Ryu and E. Shen, 2003. The effects of pedagogical agent voice and animation on learning, motivation and perceived persona. Proceeding of the Annual World conference of Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunication, June 23-28, 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp: 452-458.

Bojczuk, M., 1982. Topic difficulties in o-and a-level chemistry. Sch. Sci. Rev., 64: 545-551.

Chandler, P. and J. Sweller, 1994. Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognit. Instruct., 12: 185-233.

Craig, S.D., B. Gholson and D.M. Driscoll, 2002. Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features and redundancy. J. Educ. Psychol., 94: 428-434.
Direct Link  |  

Department for Children Schools and Families, 2009. Gender and Education-Mythbusters: Addressing Gender and Achievement: Myths and Realities. DCSF Publications, Annesley, Nottingham.

Deryakulu, D., S. Buyukozturk and H. Ozcınar, 2010. Predictors of academic achievement of student ICT teachers with different learning styles. Int. J. Hum. Soc. Sci., 5: 567-573.
Direct Link  |  

Dick, W. and L. Carey, 1996. The systematic design of instruction. 4th Edn., Harper Collins, New York, USA.

Dunn, R. and K. Dunn, 1978. Teaching Students Through their Individual Learning Styles: A Practical Approach. Prentice Hall, Reston, VA., ISBN: 10: 0879098082, Pages: 336.

Gee, D.B., 1990. The effects of preferred learning style variables on student motivation, academic achievement and course completion rates in distance education. Ed. D Dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX USA.

Gerlach, V.S. and D.P. Ely, 1980. Teaching and Media: A Systematic Approach. 2nd Edn., Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey, Pages: 420..

Gustafson, K.L. and R.M. Branch, 1997. Survey of Instructional Development Models. 3rd Edn., ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse, New York, USA.

Hamdan, A.R., M.N. Ghaffar, J. Ramli and A.J. Sihes, 2008. Study preference and motivation taxonomy of adult learners. Project Report, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor.

Henich, R., M. Molenda, J.D. Russel and S. Smaldino, 2002. Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. 7th Edn., Merrill Prentice Hall, New Jersey, ISBN: 0-13-030536-7.

Honey, P. and A. Mumford, 2006. The Learning Styles Questionnaire, 80-item version. Peter Honey Publications, Maidenhead, UK..

Johnstone, A.H., 1993. The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. J. Chem. Educ., 70: 701-705.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kemp, J.E., G.R. Morrison and S.V. Ross, 1994. Design effective instruction. Macmillan, New York, USA.

Kemp, J.E., G.R. Morrison and S.V. Ross, 2004. Design Effective Instruction. 4th Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY USA.

Kolb, D.A., 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ., USA.

Leong, S.C. and S. Al-Hawamdeh, 1999. Gender and learning attitudes in using Web-based science lessons. Inf. Res., 5: 66-66.
Direct Link  |  

Lin, H.S., T.C. Yang, H.L. Chiu and C.Y. Chou, 2002. Students difficulties in learning electrochemistry. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(D), 12: 100-105.

Mayer, R.E., K. Sobko and P.D. Mautone, 2003. Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. J. Educ. Psychol., 95: 419-425.
Direct Link  |  

Mc Keachie, W.J., 1995. Learning styles can become learning strategies. Nat. Teach. Learn. Forum, 4: 1-3.
Direct Link  |  

Morrison, G.R., S.M. Ross and J.E. Kemp, 2007. Designing Effective Instruction. 5th Edn., John Wiley and Sons, Inc, NJ..

Ofsted, 2003. Boy's Achievement in Secondary Schools. Ofsted Publications Centre, London.

Reeves, B. and C. Nass, 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, UK.

Sanger, M.J. and T.J. Greenbowe, 1997. Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: galvanic, electrolytic and concentration cells. J. Res. Sci. Teach, 34: 377-398.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Shamir, H., K. Hercules and M. Crowther, 2008. The effects of different voices in computer-based instruction on children's learning. JEMH, 17: 581-595.
Direct Link  |  

Smith, P.L. and T.J. Ragan, 2005. Instructional Design. 3rd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.

West, L.H.T. and P.J. Fensham, 1976. Prior knowledge or advance organizers as effective variables in chemical learning. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 13: 297-306.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Yahaya, A., S. Hashim and W.Z.W. Hamid, 2002. Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar. Proceedings of the International Conference on The challenge on Learning and Teaching in Brave New World, October 14-16, 2002, Hatyai City College, Thailand -.