Research Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2012
Volume: 7
Issue: 7
Page No. 365 - 369

Improvement in The Mastery of Answering Science Process Skill Questions Through Self-Learning Module

Authors : Zahara Aziz, Rohaty Majzub, Nor`aidah Nordin and Khadijah Mohd Noor


Ango, M.L., 2002. Mastery of science process skills and their effective use in the teaching of science: An educology of science education in the Nigerian context. Int. J. Educol., 16: 11-30.
Direct Link  |  

Bell, G.H. and W. Wade, 1993. Modular course design in Britain: Some problems, issues and opportunities. J. Further Higher Educ., 17: 3-12.
CrossRef  |  

Espinosa, A.A., 2009. Comparative efficiency of modular method in the teaching of high school chemistry. University of Philippines College of Education, Philippines.

Hussain, A.A. and M. Brahim, 2006. Administrative modernization in the Malaysian local government: A study in promoting efficiency, effectiveness and productivity. Pertanika J. Social Sci. Humanit., 14: 51-62.
Direct Link  |  

Jamaludin, J., J. Ahmad, N.F.M. Arshad and S.K. Abdullah, 2009. The validity of group guidance motivation module for secondary school students. Eur. J. Social Sci., 10: 343-348.
Direct Link  |  

Kemmis, S. and R.M. Taggart, 1988. The Action Research Planner. Deakin University Press, Australia.

Klop, T., S.E. Severiens, M.C.P.J. Knippels, M.H.W. van Marc and G.T.M. Geert, 2010. Effects of science education module on attitudes towards modern biotechnology of secondary school students. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 32: 1127-1150.
CrossRef  |  

MME, 2005. Curriculum specifications: Physics form. Malaysian Ministry of Education, Kuala Lumpur.

MME, 2010. A report on science education policy and inquiry based science education for development. Country Report Meeting Curriculum Development Division, Putrajaya, Malaysian Ministry of Education.

MME, 2010. A report of the observation on the implementation of elective science subjects: Physics, chemistry, biology and additional science. Science Laboratory Technical Committee.

McClune, B., 2001. Modular: A levels who are the winners and losers? A comparison of lower-sixth and upper-sixth students performance in linear and modular: A level physics examinations. Educ. Res., 43: 79-89.

McGee, C. and P. Hampton, 1996. The effects of modular curriculum delivery on a New Zealand secondary school. Sch. Organiz., 16: 7-16.

Riasat, A., 2010. Effectiveness of modular teaching in biology at secondary level. Asian Social Sci. J., 6: 35-56.

Shen, C.H., 2008. Course module development and learning achievements of entrepreneurship education: A perspective of Taiwanese case. J. Hum. Resour. Adult Learn., 4: 190-200.

Tasir, Z. and O.C. Pinb, 2012. Trainee teachers mental effort in learning spreadsheet through self-instructional module based on cognitive load theory. Comp. Educ., 59: 449-465.
CrossRef  |  

Taverner, S. and M. Wright, 1997. Why go modular? A review of modular A-level mathematics. Educ. Res., 39: 104-112.
CrossRef  |  

Thomas, G., 1993. Some reactions to the teaching of science using a modular scheme. Educ. Rev., 45: 213-225.
CrossRef  |  

Yeoman, K.H., H.A. James and L. Bowater, 2011. Development and evaluation of an undergraduate science communication module. Biosci. Educ.,

Zaidi, O. and M.N. Afizan, 2009. Mybooks 4U: Science-Exam Skill Year. Mybooks Sdn. Bhd. Co., Selangor, Malaysia.

Zerger, A., I.D. Bishop, F. Escobar and G.J. Hunter, 2002. A self-learning multimedia approach for enriching GIS education. J. Geogr. Higher Educ., 26: 67-80.
CrossRef  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2023 All Rights Reserved