References

Adams, R., J. Bessant and R. Phelps, 2006. Innovation management measurement: A review. Int. J. Manage. Rev., 8: 21-47.
CrossRef  |  

Ahn, Y.S. and H.S. Kim, 2002. An empirical study on factors influencing the performance of software venture business. Korean Manage. Rev., 31: 431-461.

Ahn, Y.S., 2009. Technology innovation activity and innovation performance in the software firms. J. Korea Soc. IT. Serv., 8: 71-87.
Direct Link  |  

Avlonitis, G.J. and H.E. Salavou, 2007. Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness and performance. J. Bus. Res., 60: 566-575.
CrossRef  |  

Barclay, D., C. Higgins and R. Thompson, 1995. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol. Stud., 2: 285-309.
Direct Link  |  

Boso, N., J.W. Cadogan and V.M. Story, 2012. Entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation as drivers of product innovation success: A study of exporters from a developing economy. Int. Small Bus. J., 31: 57-81.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Campbell, D.J. and K.F. Gingrich, 1986. The interactive effects of task complexity and participation on task performance: A field experiment. Organizational Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes, 38: 162-180.
Direct Link  |  

Carte, T.A. and C.J. Russell, 2003. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS. Q., 27: 479-501.
Direct Link  |  

Covin, J.G. and D.P. Slevin, 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strat. Manage. J., 10: 75-87.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Covin, J.G. and D.P. Slevin, 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract., 16: 7-25.
Direct Link  |  

Dekleva, S.M., 1992. The influence of the information systems development approach on maintenance. MIS. Q., 16: 355-372.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

DiMaggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell, 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev., 48: 147-160.
Direct Link  |  

Eden, A.H. and T. Mens, 2006. Measuring software flexibility. IEE. Proc. Software, 153: 113-125.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Farrell, J. and G. Saloner, 1985. Standardization, compatibility and innovation. RAND. J. Econ., 16: 70-83.
Direct Link  |  

Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker, 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Market. Res., 18: 39-50.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Frishammar, J. and S.A. Horte, 2007. The role of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation for new product development performance in manufacturing firms. Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage., 19: 765-788.
Direct Link  |  

Garcia, R. and R. Calantone, 2002. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. J. Prod. Innov. Manage., 19: 110-132.
CrossRef  |  

Gonzalez-Benito, O., J. Gonzalez-Benito and P.A. Munoz-Gallego, 2009. Role of entrepreneurship and market orientation in firms success. Eur. J. Marketing, 43: 500-522.
Direct Link  |  

Gunsel, A. and A. Acikgoz, 2013. The effects of team flexibility and emotional intelligence on software development performance. Group Decis. Negotiation, 22: 359-377.
Direct Link  |  

Hurley, R.F. and G.T.M. Hult, 1998. Innovation, market orientation and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. J. Market., 62: 42-54.
Direct Link  |  

Jang, S., H. Kim and M. Choi, 2011. The effects of innovativeness, standardization and flexibility on the performance of software company with entrepreneurship. J. Internet Electron. Commerce Res., 11: 1-19.

Jiang, J.J., G. Klein, H.G. Hwang, J. Huang and S.Y. Hung, 2004. An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Inform. Manage., 41: 279-288.
CrossRef  |  

Jordan, G. and E. Segelod, 2006. Software innovativeness: Outcomes on project performance, knowledge enhancement and external linkages. R. D. Manage., 36: 127-142.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Jun, D.Y. and H.D. Yoon, 2011. A study on the effect of the technological innovation support system on venture company's entrepreneurship and technological innovation performance. J. Korean Entrepreneurship Soc., 6: 71-98.

Keen, P.G.W., 1991. Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, UK.

Kim, K.Y., K.S. Na and D.G. Yang, 2002. The effects of requirement uncertainty, control standardization, interactions on software quality. Asia Pacific J. Inf. Syst., 12: 101-120.

Kreiser, P.M., L.D. Marino, D.F. Kuratko and K.M. Weaver, 2013. Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: The non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance. Small Bus. Econ., 40: 273-291.
CrossRef  |  

Kwun, M.Y., 2010. The effects of entrepreneurial characteristics, technological capabilities and networks on firm performance of technology-based start-ups. Ph.D Thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, South Korea.

Lamastra, C.R., 2009. Software innovativeness: A comparison between proprietary and free/open source solutions offered by Italian SMEs. R. D. Manage., 39: 153-169.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lee, C., K. Lee and J.M. Pennings, 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Manage. J., 22: 615-640.
CrossRef  |  

Lee, D.Y. and E.W.K. Tsang, 2001. The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth. J. Manage. Stud., 38: 583-602.
CrossRef  |  

Lee, I.H., J.H. Hahn and K.J. Hwang, 2011. An empirical study on the new product performance and entrepreneurial intention between strategic orientation and innovation climate in venture business CEO. J. Entrepreneurship Venture Stud., 4: 49-71.

Lee, S.D., 2013. An empirical study on the firm’s performance and technological innovation of entrepreneurial orientation in inno-biz SEMs’ CEO. Ph.D Thesis, Kyungsung University, Pusan, South Korea.

Li, Y., K.C. Chang, H.G. Chen and J.J. Jiang, 2010. Software development team flexibility antecedents. J. Syst. Software, 83: 1726-1734.
Direct Link  |  

Liang, H., N. Saraf, Q. Hu and Y. Xue, 2007. Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Q., 31: 59-87.
Direct Link  |  

Liu, J.Y.C., V.J. Chen, C.L. Chan and T. Lie, 2008. The impact of software process standardization on software flexibility and project management performance: Control theory perspective. Inf. Software Technol., 50: 889-896.
Direct Link  |  

Mathew, J., E. Ogbonna and L.C. Harris, 2012. Culture, employee work outcomes and performance: An empirical analysis of Indian software firms. J. World Bus., 47: 194-203.
Direct Link  |  

McKenney, J.L., 1995. Waves of Change: Business Evolution Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA., ISBN-13: 978-0875845647, Pages: 256.

Meyer, J.W. and B. Rowan, 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol., 80: 340-363.
Direct Link  |  

Miller, D. and P.H. Friesen, 1982. Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurship firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Manage. J., 3: 1-25.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Miller, D., 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manage. Sci., 29: 770-791.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Myers, S. and D.G. Marquis, 1996. Successful industrial innovation. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia.

Na, K.S., 2004. The impacts of requirement uncertainty and standardization on software project performance: A comparison of Korea and USA. J. Inf. Technol. Appl. Manage., 11: 15-27.

Nadkarni, S. and P.O.L. Herrmann, 2010. CEO personality, strategic flexibility and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Acad. Manage. J., 53: 1050-1073.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Nagpal, P. and K. Lyytinen, 2010. Modularity, information technology outsourcing success and business performance. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), December 12-15, 2010, ICIS, St. Louis, Missouri, ISBN:978-0-615-41898-8, pp: 64-64.

Nam, K. and M. Na, 2001. A study on the effect of software process capability and information technology investment on the firm’s performance. Sogang J. Bus., 12: 37-53.

Nambisan, S., 2002. Software firm evolution and innovation-orientation. J. Eng. Technol. Manage., 19: 141-165.
Direct Link  |  

Nidumolu, S.R., 1996. Standardization, requirements uncertainty and software project performance. Inf. Manage., 31: 135-150.
Direct Link  |  

Nirjar, A., 2008. Innovations and evolution of software SMEs: Exploring the trajectories for sustainable growth. Vision, 12: 47-59.
Direct Link  |  

Nunnally, J.C., 1967. Psychometric Theory. 1st Edn., McGraw Hill, New York, Pages: 640.

Ravichandran, T. and C. Lertwongsatien, 2005. Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. J. Manage. Inform. Syst., 21: 237-276.

Rogers, E.M., 1995. Diffusion and Innovation. 4th Edn., Free Press, New York, USA., ISBN:9780028740744, Pages: 519.

Sciascia, S., L. Naldi and E. Hunter, 2006. Market orientation as determinant of entrepreneurship: An empirical investigation on SMEs. Intl. Entrepreneurship Manage. J., 2: 21-38.
Direct Link  |  

Slevin, D.P. and J.G. Covin, 1990. Juggling entrepreneurial style and organizational structure. MIT. Sloan Manage. Rev., 31: 43-53.
Direct Link  |  

Suh, C.Y. and E.H. Jeong, 2003. The effect of project risk and risk management on software development project performance. Asia Pacific J. Inf. Syst., 13: 199-217.

Sung, T.K., 2009. An exploratory study on the relationship between standardization and technological innovation: A comparison of manufacturing and service firms in Korea. J. Korean Acad. Assoc. Bus. Administration, 22: 761-782.

Wang, E.T., P.H. Ju, J.J. Jiang and G. Klein, 2008. The effects of change control and management review on software flexibility and project performance. Inf. Manage., 45: 438-443.
Direct Link  |  

Yam, R.C.M., J.C. Guan, K.F. Pun and E.P.Y. Tang, 2004. An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: Some empirical finding in Beijing, China. Res. Policy, 33: 1123-1140.
Direct Link  |  

Yang, C.H. and J.R. Chen, 2003. Innovation and market value in newly‐industrialized countries: The case of Taiwanese electronics firms. Asian Econ. J., 17: 205-220.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Yoo, S.J., B.G. Ki, J.H. Choi and C.S. Leem, 2009. A study on the primary factors of internal and external competency for improving performance of small and medium software company. J. Korea Ind. Inf. Syst. Res., 14: 17-31.
Direct Link  |  

Zahra, S.A. and J.G. Covin, 1993. Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strat. Manage. J., 14: 451-478.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Zahra, S.A., 1996. Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environment. J. Bus. Venturing, 11: 189-219.
CrossRef  |  

Zhu, K., K.L. Kraemer and S. Xu, 2006. The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Manage. Sci., 52: 1557-1576.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |