Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
Year:
2012
Volume:
11
Issue:
10
Page No.
1633 - 1642
References
Blaik, M.A., R.R. Hanson, S.A. Kincaid, J.T. Hathcock, J.A. Hudson and D.K. Baird, 2000. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine tarsus: Normal anatomy. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 41: 131-141.
CrossRef | Branch, M.V., R.C. Murray, S.J. Dyson and A.E. Goodship, 2007. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine tarsus. Clin. Tech. Equine Pract., 6: 96-102.
CrossRef | Buckwalter, K.A., 1996. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Radiology, 3: 99-122.
Bureau, N.J., P.A. Kaplan and R.G. Dussault, 1995. MRI of the knee: A simplified approach. Curr. Probl. Diag. Radiol., 24: 4-49.
CrossRef | Choquet, P., A. Constantinesco and H. Sick, 2000. MRI of the equine digit with a dedicated low-field magnet. Vet. Rec., 146: 616-617.
CrossRef | Dyson, S. and R. Murray, 2007. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot. Clin. Tech. Equine Pract., 6: 46-61.
CrossRef | Dyson, S., R. Murray, M. Schramme and M. Branch, 2003. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot: 15 horses. Equine Vet. J., 35: 18-26.
PubMed | Mair, T.S. and J. Kinns, 2005. Deep digital flexor tendonitis in the equine foot diagnosed by low-field magnetic resonance imaging in the standing patient: 18 cases. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 46: 458-466.
PubMed | Marti-Bonmati, L. and M. Kormano, 1997. MR equipment acquisition strategies: Low-field or high-field scanners. Eur. Radiol., 7: 263-268.
CrossRef | Murray, R.C., B.L. Roberts, M.C. Schramme, S.J. Dyson and M. Branch, 2004. Quantitative evaluation of equine deep digital flexor tendon morphology using magnetic resonance imaging. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 45: 103-111.
PubMed | Murray, R.C., S. Dyson, M. Branch and M. Schramme, 2007. Validation of magnetic resonance imaging use in equine limbs. Clin. Tech. Equine Pract., 6: 26-36.
CrossRef | Parizel, P.M., H.A. Dijkstra, G.P. Geenen, P.A. Kint, R.J. Versteylen, P.J. Van Wiechen and A.M. De Schepper, 1995. Low-field versus high-field MR imaging of the knee: A comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur. J. Radiol., 19: 132-138.
PubMed | Rutt, B.K. and D.H. Lee, 1996. The impact of field strength on image quality in MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 6: 57-62.
CrossRef | Straaten, G.O. and S.N. Collins, 1995. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine stifle: Normal anatomy. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 36: 119-125.
Whitton, R.C., C. Buckley, T. Donovan, A.D. Wales and R. Dennis, 1998. The diagnosis of lameness associated with distal limb pathology in a horse: a comparison of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Vet. J., 155: 223-229.
PubMed | Widmer, W.R., K.A. Buckwalter, M.A. Hill, J.F. Fessler and S. Ivancevich, 1999. A technique for magnetic resonance imaging of equine cadaver specimens. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 40: 10-14.
PubMed |