Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2012
Volume: 11
Issue: 4
Page No. 483 - 487

The Use of Chicken Embryos as a Model for Brucella abortus Strains Isolation from Milk Collected Samples

Authors : C.E. Pulido, H.D.I. Martinez, V.M. Villanueva, O.V. Amador, C.A. Peniche, S.V.T. Pardio, G.L.A. Landin, C.R. Flores, A.J.F. Morales and M.A. Lopez

References

Baldwin, C.L., 2002. Immune response overview. Vet. Microbiol., 90: 365-366.
CrossRef  |  

Bruce, D., 1924. Prevencion of disease. Science, 60: 109-124.

Carter, G.R. and D.J. Wise, 2004. Essentials of Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology. 6th Edn., Wiley-Blackwell, USA., ISBN-13: 9780813811796, Pages: 290.

Cheville, N.F., A.E. Jensen, S.M. Halling, F.M. Tatum and D.C. Morfitt et al., 1992. Bacterial survival, lymph node changes and immunologic responses of cattle vaccinated with standard and mutant strains of Brucella abortus. Am. J. Vet. Res., 53: 1881-1888.
PubMed  |  

Detilleux, P.G., N.F. Cheville and B.L. Deyoe, 1988. Pathogenesis of Brucella abortus in chicken embryos. Vet. Pathol., 25: 138-146.
PubMed  |  

Gast, R.K., J. Guard-Petter and P.S. Holt, 2002. Characteristics of Salmonella enteritidis contamination in eggs after oral, aerosol and intravenous inoculation of laying hens. Avian Dis., 46: 629-635.
Direct Link  |  

Gay, K. and S.R. Damon, 1950. Use for the chick embryo for isolation of Brucella; multiplication of the organism in the yolk sac and selection of embryo age optimal for isolation from blood. Public Health Rep., 65: 1187-1194.
PubMed  |  

Halling, S.M., 2002. Paradigm shifts in vaccine development: Lessons learned about antigenicity, pathogenicity and virulence of Brucellae. Vet. Microbiol., 90: 545-552.
PubMed  |  

Hitchner, S.B., C.H. Domermunth, H.G. Parchase and J.E. Williams, 1980. Isolation and Identification of Avian Pathogens. American Association of Avian Pathologists Inc., USA., pp: 63-66.

Hobby, G.L., A.P. Holman, M.D. Iseman and J.M. Jones, 1973. Enumeration of tubercle bacilli in sputum of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 4: 94-104.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Lopez, M.A., 2006. Agentes infecciosos. Rev. Latinoam. Microbiol., 48: 146-153.

Luna-Martinez, J.E. and C. Mejia-Teran, 2002. Brucellosis in Mexico: Current status and trends. Vet. Microbiol., 90: 19-30.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Mastorides, S.M., R.L. Oehler, J.N. Greene, J.T. Sinnott, M. Kranik and R.L. Sandin, 1999. The deteccion of airborne Mycobacterium tuberculosis using micropore membrane air sampling and polymerase chain reaction. Chest, 115: 19-25.
Direct Link  |  

Moore, D.F. and J.I. Curry, 1998. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum sediments by ligase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36: 1028-1031.
Direct Link  |  

Samartino, L.E. and F.M. Enright, 1993. Pathogenesis of abortion of bovine brucellosis. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 16: 95-101.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Tizard, I.R., 2004. Veterinary Immunology: An Introduction. 7th Edn., Saunders, Philadelphia, PA., USA., ISBN-13: 9780721601366, Pages: 496.

Yeager, Jr. H., J. Lacy, L.R. Smith and C.A. LeMaistre, 1967. Quantitative studies of mycobacterial populations in sputum and saliva. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., 95: 998-1004.
PubMed  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved