References

Alsabti, E., 1979. Survival rates of breast carcinoma patients after surgery and anaesthetic. J. Surg. Oncol., 11: 261-267.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Committee on Publication Ethics, 2000. Committee on publication Ethics: The COPE report 1999. Guidelines on good publication practice. Occup. Environ. Med., 57: 506-509.
PubMed  |  

Cyranoski, D., 2006. Hwang takes the stand at fraud trial. Nature, 444: 12-13.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Farthing, M., R. Horton and R. Smith, 2000. Research misconduct: Britains failure to act. BMJ., 321: 1485-1486.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Garfield, E. and A.W. Dorof, 1990. The impact of fraudulent research on the scientific literature. The Stephen E. Breuning case. JAMA., 263: 1424-1426.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Guenin, L.M., 1999. Expressing a consensus on candour. Nature, 402: 577-578.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Hwang, W.S., S.I. Roh, B.C. Lee, S.K. Kang and D.K. Kwon et al., 2005. Patient-specific embryonic stem cells derived from human SCNT blastocysts. Science, 308: 1777-1783.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Hwang, W.S., Y.J. Ryu, J.H. Park, E.S. Park and E.G. Lee et al., 2004. Evidence of a pluripotent human embryonic stem cell line derived from a cloned blastocyst. Science, 303: 1669-1674.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Interlandi, J., 2006. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be. N. Y. Times Mag., 22: 98-103.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Jones, J., 1999. UK. watchdog issues guidelines to combat medical research fraud. BMJ., 319: 660-660.
Direct Link  |  

Keranen, L., 2006. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: Considerations for sanction assignment. Account Res., 13: 179-205.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kesselheim, A.S. and D.M. Studdert, 2008. Whistleblower-initiated enforcement actions against health care fraud and abuse in the United States, 1996 to 2005. Ann. Intern. Med., 149: 342-349.
Direct Link  |  

Lock, S., 1995. Lessons from the Pearce affair: Handling scientific fraud. BMJ., 310: 1547-1548.
Direct Link  |  

Pascal, C.B., 2006. Complainant issues in research misconduct: The office of research integrity experience. Exp. Biol. Med., 231: 1264-1270.
Direct Link  |  

Ranstam, J., M. Buyse, S.L. George, S. Evans and N.L. Geller et al., 2000. Fraud in medical research: An international survey of biostatisticians. ISCB Subcommittee on Fraud. Control Clin. Trials, 21: 415-427.
CrossRef  |  

Ryan, K.J., 1999. Research misconduct in clinical research--the American experience and response. Acta. Oncol., 38: 93-97.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Schneider, C., 2000. Safeguarding good scientific practice: New institutional approaches in Germany. Sci. Eng. Ethics, 6: 49-56.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Spece, R.G. and C. Bernstein, 2007. What is scientific misconduct, who has to (dis)prove it and to what level of certainty?. Med. Law, 26: 493-510.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Sudbo, J., J.J. Lee, S.M. Lippman, J. Mork and S. Sagen et al., 2005. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of oral cancer: A nested case-control study. Lancet, 366: 1359-1366.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Summerskill, W., D. Collingridge, and H. Frankish, 2009. Protocols, probity and publication. Lancet, 373: 992-992.
CrossRef  |  

Thurber, J., 1940. James Thurbers Fables for our Time and Famous Poems Illustrated. Harper and Row Publishers, New York.

Tuffs, A., 2000. Fraud study concludes that self regulation has failed. BMJ., 321: 71-71.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Wadman, M., 2005. One in three scientists confesses to having sinned. Nature, 435: 718-719.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Wilmshurst, P., 2002. Fraud in research. Clin. Med., 2: 159-160.

Wilmut, I., A.E. Schnieke, J. McWhir, A.J. Kind and K.H.S. Campbell, 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature, 385: 810-813.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |