The Social Sciences

Year: 2015
Volume: 10
Issue: 6
Page No. 723 - 733

Balanced Scorecard: Empirical Study in Brazil

Authors : Deise Menezes de Amorim and Maria Joao Cardoso Viera Machado

References

Albright, T.L., C.M. Burgess, A.R. Hibbets and M.L. Roberts, 2010. Four steps to simplify multimeasure performance evaluations using the balanced scorecard. J. Corporate Account. Finance, 21: 63-68.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Anand, M., B.S. Sahay and S. Saha, 2005. Balanced scorecard in Indian companies. Vikalpa, 30: 11-25.

Atkinson, A. and R.S. Kaplan, 2007. Management Accounting. 5th Edn., Pearson International, New Jersey.

Atkinson, A.A., R. Balakrishnan, P. Booth, J.M. Cote and T. Groot et al., 1997. New directions in management accounting research. J. Manage. Accounting Res., 9: 79-108.
Direct Link  |  

Axa, C. and T. Bjornenak, 2005. Bundling and diffusion of management accounting innovations: The case of the balanced scorecard in Sweden. Manage. Account. Res., 16: 1-20.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Aziz, T., M.B. Khan and R. Singh, 2010. Effects of information technology usage on student learning: An empirical study in the United States. Int. J. Manage., 27: 205-217.

Bol, J.C., 2011. The determinants and Performance effects of managers' performance evaluation biases. Account. Rev., 86: 1549-1575.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Bourguignon, A., V. Malleret and H. Norreklit, 2004. The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord: The ideological dimension. Manage. Account. Res., 15: 107-134.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Butler, J.B., S.C. Henderson and C. Raiborn, 2011. Sustainability and the balanced scorecard: Integrating green measures into business reporting. Manage. Account., 12: 2-11.
Direct Link  |  

Cardinaels, E. and P.M.G. van Veen-Dirks, 2010. Financial versus non-financial information: The impact of information organization and presentation in a balanced scorecard. Account. Organiz. Soc., 35: 565-578.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Cavalluzzo, K.S. and C.D. Ittner, 2004. Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Account. Organiz. Soc., 29: 243-267.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Cokins, G., 2010. The promise and perils of the balanced scorecard. J. Corporate Account. Finance, 21: 19-28.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Crabtree, A.D. and G. DeBusk, 2008. The effects of adopting the balanced scorecard on shareholder returns. Adv. Account., 24: 8-15.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Curado, C. and J. Manica, 2010. Management control systems in Madeira Island largest firms: Evidence on the balanced scorecard usage. J. Bus. Econ. Manage., 11: 652-670.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Debusk, G.K., R.M. Brown and L.N. Killough, 2003. Components and relative weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the balanced scorecard. Br. Account. Rev., 35: 215-231.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Dillman, D.A., 2006. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method-2007 Update with New Internet, Visual and Mixed-Mode Guide. John Wiley Press, New Jersey, USA.

Epstein, M. and J.F. Manzoni, 1998. Implementing corporate strategy: From tableaux de bord to balanced scorecards. Eur. Manage. J., 16: 190-203.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Herath, H.S.B., W.G. Bremser and J.G. Birnberg, 2010. Joint selection of balanced scorecard targets and weights in a collaborative setting. J. Accounting Public Policy, 29: 45-59.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Hoque, Z. and W. James, 2000. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. J. Manage. Account. Res., 12: 1-17.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ismail, T.H., 2007. Performance evaluation measures in the private sector: Egyptian practice. Manage. Audit. J., 22: 503-513.
Direct Link  |  

Ittner, C.D., D.F. Larcker and T. Randall, 2003. Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Account. Org. Soc., 28: 715-741.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Juhmani, O., 2007. Usage, motives and usefulness of the balanced scorecard: Evidence from Bahrain. Int. J. Bus. Res., 7: 106-117.

Kald, M. and F. Nilsson, 2000. Performance measurement at Nordic companies. Eur. Manage. J., 1: 113-127.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, 1992. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev., 70: 71-79.
PubMed  |  

Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, 1993. Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Bus. Rev., 71: 134-147.

Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. 1st Edn., Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA., USA., ISBN: 978-0875846514, Pages: 336.

Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, 1996. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus. Rev., 74: 75-87.
Direct Link  |  

Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, 2000. Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Bus. Rev., 78: 167-202.
PubMed  |  

Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, 2004. Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harvard Bus. Rev., 82: 52-63.
PubMed  |  

Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton, 2008. Mastering the management system. Harvard Bus. Rev., 86: 62-77.

Kaplan, S.E. and P.S. Wisner, 2009. The Judgmental effects of management communications and a fifth Balanced Scorecard category on performance evaluation. Behav. Res. Account., 21: 37-56.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kraus, K. and J. Lind, 2010. The impact of the corporate balanced scorecard on corporate control: A research note. Manage. Account. Res., 21: 265-277.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Liedtka, S.L., B.K. Church and M.R. Ray, 2008. Performance variability, ambiguity intolerance and balanced scorecard-based performance assessments. Behav. Res. Account., 20: 73-88.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Macarthur, J., 2006. Cultural influences on German versus U.S. management accounting practices. Manage. Account. Q., 7: 10-16.

Machado, M.J., 2013. Balanced scorecard: Empirical study on small and medium size enterprises. Rev. Bus. Manage., 15: 129-148.

Malina, M.A. and F.H. Selto, 2001. Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. J. Manage. Account. Res., 3: 47-90.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Neumann, B.R., M.L. Roberts and E. Cauvin, 2010. Information search using the balanced scorecard: What matters? J. Corporate Account. Finance, 21: 61-66.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Norreklit, H., 2000. The balance on the balanced scorecard a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Manage. Account. Res., 11: 65-88.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Norreklit, H., 2003. The balanced scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the balanced scorecard. Account. Organiz. Soc., 28: 591-619.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Northcott, D. and J. Smith, 2011. Managing performance at the top: A balanced scorecard for boards of directors. J. Account. Organiz. Change, 7: 33-56.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Nunes, C.R. and M.J.C.V. Machado, 2014. Performance evaluation methods in the hotel industry. Tourism Manage. Stud., 10: 23-29.
Direct Link  |  

Rigby, D.K., 2001. Management tools and techniques: A survey. California Manage. Rev., 43: 139-160.
Direct Link  |  

Silk, S., 1998. Automating the balanced scorecard. Manage. Account., 79: 38-44.

Speckbacher, G., J. Bischof and T. Pfeiffer, 2003. A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecards in German-speaking countries. Manage. Account. Res., 14: 361-388.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sundin, H., M. Granlund and D.A. Brown, 2010. Balancing multiple competing objectives with a balanced scorecard. Eur. Account. Rev., 19: 203-246.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Tayler, W.B., 2010. The balanced scorecard as a strategy-evaluation tool: The effects of implementation involvement and a causal-chain focus. Account. Rev., 85: 1095-1117.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Wiersma, E., 2009. For which purposes do managers use balanced scorecards?: An empirical study. Manage. Account. Res., 20: 239-251.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Yang, H., G. Yang and W. Wu, 2006. Employee demography moderate involvement of decision making and adoption of management accounting innovations for Chinese accountants. J. Am. Acad. Bus., 9: 338-343.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved