Asian Journal of Information Technology

Year: 2014
Volume: 13
Issue: 9
Page No. 485 - 493

Real Time Simulation of Routing Virtualization over a Test bed designed for the Various IPv4-IPv6 Transition Techniques

Authors : Sheryl Radley and Shalini Punithavathani

References

AlJa'afreh, R.E., J. Mellor and I. Awan, 2009. A comparison between the tunneling process and mapping schemes for IPv4/IPv6 transition. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, May 26-29, 2009, Bradford, UK., pp: 601-606.

Aoun, C. and E. Davies, 2007. Reasons to move the Network Address Translator-Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to historic status. Network Working Group, RFC 4966, July 2007. http://www.hjp.at/doc/rfc/rfc4966.html.

Azcorra, A., M. Kryczka and A. Garcia-Martinez, 2010. Integrated routing and addressing for improved IPv4 and IPv6 coexistence. IEEE Commun. Lett., 14: 477-479.
CrossRef  |  

CISCO, 2002. The ABCs of IP version 6: Technical report. CISCO IOS Learning Services, CISCO.

CISCO, 2005. IPv6 assessment and migrations services. http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/gov/IPv6_Services_DS.pdf.

Cui, Y., J. Dong, P. Wu, J. Wu, C. Metz, Y.L. Lee and A. Durand, 2013. Tunnel-based IPv6 transition. IEEE Internet Comput., 17: 62-68.
CrossRef  |  

Govil, J., J. Govil, N. Kaur and H. Kaur, 2008. An examination of IPv4 and IPv6 networks: Constraints and various transition mechanisms. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Southeastcon, April 3-6, 2008, Huntsville, AL., USA., pp: 178-185.

Hiromi, R. and H. Yoshifuji, 2005. Problem on IPv4-IPv6 transition. Proceedings of International Symposium on Application and the Internet Workshops, January 31-February 4, 2005, Trento, Italy -.

Jayanthi, J.G. and S.A. Rabara, 2010. IPv6 addressing architecture in IPv4 network. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, February 26-28, 2010, Singapore, pp: 461-465.

Lee, Y., A. Durand, J. Woodyatt and R. Droms, 2011. Dual-stack lite broadband deployments following IPv4 exhaustion. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Request for Comments: 6333, August 2011.

Li, Z., W. Peng and Y. Liu, 2012. An innovative Ipv4-ipv6 transition way for Internet service provider. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Robotics and Applications, June 3-5, 2012, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp: 672-675.

Nordmark, E. and R. Gilligan, 2005. Basic transition mechanisms for IPv6 hosts and routers. RFC 4213, October 2005. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4213.

Popoviciu, C., E. Levy-Avegnoli and P. Grossetete, 2006. Deploying IPv6 Networks. Cisco Press, Indianapolis, IN., USA.

Punithavathani, D.S. and K. Sankaranarayanan, 2009. IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms. Eur. J. Sci. Res., 34: 110-124.
Direct Link  |  

Sailan, M.K., R. Hassan and A. Patel, 2009. A comparative review of IPv4 and IPv6 for research test bed. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Volume 2, August 5-7, 2009, Selangor, Malaysia, pp: 427-433.

Srisuresh, P. and K. Egevang, 2001. RFC 3022-Traditional IP network address translator (Traditional NAT). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=RFC3022.

Tsirtsis, G. and P. Srisuresh, 2000. Network address translation-protocol translation (NAT-PT). RFC 2766, Internet Engineering Task Force.

Wu, Y. and X. Zhou, 2011. Research on the IPv6 performance analysis based on dual-protocol stack and tunnel transition. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Education, August 3-5, 2011, Singapore, pp: 1091-1093.

Zhai, Y., C. Bao and X. Li, 2011. Transition from ipv4 to ipv6: A translation approach. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage, July 28-30, 2011, Dalian, China, pp: 30-39.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved