References

Agah, A. and K. Tanie, 2000. Intelligent graphical user interface design utilizing multiple fuzzy agents. Interact. Comput., 12: 529-542.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Alavi, M. and D.E. Leidner, 2001. Research commentary: Technologymediated learnin a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Inform. Syst. Res., 12: 1-10.
Direct Link  |  

Alotaibi, S.J. and D. Argles, 2011. FingerID: A new security model based on fingerprint recognition for Personal Learning Environments (PLEs). Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Conference on Global Engineering Education (EDUCON), April 4-6, 2011, IEEE, New York, USA., ISBN:978-1-61284-643-9, pp: 142-151.

Bernard, M., B. Lida, S. Riley, T. Hackler and K. Janzen, 2002. A comparison of popular online fonts: Which size and type is best. Usability News, Vol. 4,

Bernard, M., C.H. Liao and M. Mills, 2001. The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. Proceedings of the Conference on CHI'01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, March 31-April 5, 2001, ACM, New York, USA., ISBN:1-58113-340-5, pp: 175-176.

Calvary, G., J. Coutaz, D. Thevenin, Q. Limbourg and L. Bouillon et al., 2003. A unifying reference framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interact. Comput., 15: 289-308.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Chalmers, P.A., 2003. The role of cognitive theory in human-computer interface. Computers Human Behav., 19: 593-607.
CrossRef  |  

Hill, A.L. and L.F. Scharff, 1999. Readability of computer displays as a function of colour, saturation and background texture. Eng. Psychol. Cognit. Ergon., 4: 123-130.

Hui, Y., C. Nyean, Y. Jiun, N. Razak and A. Zamri, 2012. Development of mathematics question banking system for secondary school in Malaysia. Int. Conf. Manage. Educ. Innovation, 37: 12-16.

Islam, M.Z., M.M. Rahman and M.K. Islam, 2013. Online examination system in Bangladesh context. Intl. J. Sci. Environ. Technol., 2: 351-359.

Karim, N.A. and Z. Shukur, 2015. Review of user authentication methods in online examination. Asian J. Inf. Technol., 14: 166-175.

Park, K.S. and C.H. Lim, 1999. A structured methodology for comparative evaluation of user interface designs using usability criteria and measures. Intl. J. Ind. Ergon., 23: 379-389.
Direct Link  |  

Rello, L., G. Kanvinde and R.B. Yates, 2012. Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. Proceedings of the International Conference on Cross-Disciplinary on Web Accessibility, April 16-17, 2012, ACM, New York, USA., ISBN:978-1-4503-1019-2, pp: 1-36.

Rello, L., M. Pielot, M.C. Marcos and R. Carlini, 2013. Size matters (spacing not): 18 points for a dyslexic-friendly Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cross-Disciplinary on Web Accessibility, May 13-15, 2013, ACM, New York, USA., ISBN:978-1-4503-1844-0, pp: 1-17.

Sarrayrih, M.A. and M. Ilyas, 2013. Challenges of online exam, performances and problems for online university exam. IJCSI. Intl. J. Comput. Sci., 10: 439-443.

Trenholm, S., 2007. A review of cheating in fully asynchronous online courses: A math or fact-based course perspective. J. Educ. Technol. Syst., 35: 281-300.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Xiao, B.H. and W. Ji, 2011. Authentication of students and students. Work E. Learn., 2011: 1-49.