References

APHA., 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th Edn., American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC., USA., pp: 9-35.

Adelekan, B.A. and A.I. Bamgboye, 2009. Comparison of biogas productivity of cassava peels mixed in selected ratios with major livestock waste types. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 4: 571-577.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ahring, B.K., 2003. Perspectives for Anaerobic Digestion. In: Biomethanation I. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Ahring, B.K., I. Angelidaki, E. Conway de Macrio, H.N.Gavala and J. Hofman-Bang (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, ISBN:978-3-540-44322-3, pp: 1-30.

Bayitse, R., G.N. Laryea, G. Selormey, W.O. Oduro and M. Aggey et al., 2014. Anaerobic co-digestion of cassava peels and manure: A technological approach for biogas generation and bio-fertilizer production-feature article. J. Applied Sci. Technol., 19: 10-17.

Dinsdale, R., K. Bryne and D. Tucker, 2007. The Anaerobic Digestion of Textile Desizing Wastewater. In: Ecotextiles, Miraftab, M. and A.R. Horrocks (Eds.)., Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK., pp: 163-167.

Eze, J.I. and K.E. Agbo, 2010. Studies on the microbial spectrum in anaerobic biomethannization of cow dung in 10m₃ fixed dome biogas digester. Int. J. Phys. Sci., 5: 1331-1337.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

FAO., 2012. Statistical yearbook, economic and social development department. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy.

Ilori, M.O., S.A. Adebusoye, A.K. Iawal and O.A. Awotiwon, 2007. Production of biogas from banana and plantain peels. Adv. Environ. Biol., 1: 33-38.
Direct Link  |  

Ithnin, N.H.C. and H. Hashim, 2019. Predictive modelling for biogas generation from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME). Chem. Eng. Trans., 72: 313-318.
Direct Link  |  

Iwayemi, A., 2008. Nigeria's dual energy problems: Policy issues and challenges. Int. Assoc. Energy Econ., 53: 17-21.
Direct Link  |  

Jayaraj, S., B. Deepanraj and V. Sivasubramanian, 2014. Study on the effect of pH on biogas production from food waste by anaerobic digestion. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Green Energy Conference, May 25-28, 2014, Tianjin, China, pp: 799-805.

Kashi, S., B. Satari, M. Lundin, I.S. Horvath and M. Othman, 2017. Application of a mixture design to identify the effects of substrates ratios and interactions on anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sludge, grease trap waste and meat processing waste. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 5: 6156-6164.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Mata-Alvarez, J., J. Dosta, S. Mace and S. Astals, 2011. Codigestion of solid wastes: A review of its uses and perspectives including modeling. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 31: 99-111.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Mata-Alvarez, J., P. Llabres-Luengo and F. Cecchi, 1993. Kinetic and performance study of a batch two-phase anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes. Biomass, 5: 481-488.

Mukhtar, F., A. Abubakar, U.A. Saulawa and H. Garba, 2018. Biogas production from cow dung for sustainable energy generation. UMYU J. Microbiol. Res., 3: 81-86.

Munshi, S.K., J. Roy and R. Noor, 2018. Microbiological investigation and determination of the antimicrobial potential of cow dung samples. Stamford J. Microbiol., 8: 34-37.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Nand, K., S.S. Devi, P. Viswanath, S. Deepak and R. Sarada, 1991. Anaerobic digestion of canteen wastes for Biogas production: Process optimisation. Process Biochem., 26: 1-5.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Nnabuchi, M.N., F.O Akubuko, C. Augustine and G.Z. Ugwu, 2012. Assessment of the effect of co-digestion of chicken dropping and cow dung on biogas generation. Int. Res. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Innovation (IRJESTI.), 1: 238-243.
Direct Link  |  

Ofoefule, A.U., E.O. Uzodinma and C.N. Anyanwu, 2010. Studies on the effect of anaerobic digestion on the microbial flora of animal wastes 2: digestion and modelling of process parameters. Trends Applied Sci. Res., 5: 39-47.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Patil, J.H., M.A. Raj, P.L. Muralidhara, S.M. Desai and G.K.M. Raju, 2012. Kinetics of anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth using poultry litter as inoculum. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev., 3: 94-98.
Direct Link  |  

Ranade, D.R., T.Y. Yeole and S.H. Godbole, 1987. Production of biogas from market waste. Biomass, 13: 147-153.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Salam, B., S. Biswas and M.S. Rabbi, 2015. Biogas from mesophilic anaerobic digestion of cow dung using silica gel as catalyst. Procedia Eng., 105: 652-657.

Sebola, M.R., H.B. Tesfagiorgis and E. Muzenda, 2015. Methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow dung, chicken manure, pig manure and sewage waste. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering Vol. 1, July 1-3, 2015, WCE, London, UK., pp: 1-7.

Speece, R.E., 1996. Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters. Archae Press, Nashville Tennessee, USA., ISBN-13: 978-0965022606, Pages: 416.

Syaichurrozi, I., 2018. Biogas production from co-digestion Salvinia molesta and rice straw and kinetics. Renewable Energy, 115: 76-86.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Tian, H., N. Duan, C. Lin, X. Li and M. Zhong, 2015. Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and pig manure with different mixing ratios. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 120: 51-57.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ukpai, P.A. and M.N. Nnabuchi, 2012. Comparative study of biogas production from cow dung, cow pea and cassava peeling using 45 litres biogas digester. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 3: 1864-1869.
Direct Link  |  

Yono, B., I.N., Widiasa, S. Johari and Sunarso, 2010. The kinetic of biogas production rate from cattle manure in batch mode. Int. J. Chem. Biol. Eng., 3: 39-44.
Direct Link  |  

Yusuf, M.O.L., A. Debora and D.E. Ogheneruona, 2011. Ambient temperature kinetic assessment of biogas production from co-digestion of horse and cow dung. Res. Agric. Eng., 57: 97-104.
Direct Link  |