Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
421 - 428
AFRC, 1993. Energy and the protein requirements of the ruminants. An Advisory Themanual Prepared by the AFRC Technical Committe on Responses to the Nutrients, CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Absalon, M.V.A., 2008. The productivity imitations theand potentials for thedual-purpose cow herds in the central coastal the (leeward) region of the Veracruz, Mexico. M.Sc. Thesis, Cornell University, pp: 226.
Aharoni, Y., Z. Henki, A. Ezra, A. Dolev and A. Shabtay et al
., 2009. Grazing behavior and energy costs of activity: A comparison between 2 types of cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 87: 2719-2731.Direct Link |
Archer, J.A., E.C. Richardson, R.M. Hera and P.F. Arthur, 1999. Potencial for selection theto improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: A review. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 50: 147-161.
Boyles, S.L. and J.G. Riley, 1991. Feedlot performance of Brahman x Angus versus Angus steers during cold weather. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 2677-2684.
Calegare, L., M.M. Alencar, I.U. Packer and D.P.D. Lanna, 2007. Energy requirements and cow/calf efficiency of Nellore, Continental and British Bos taurus
x Nellore crosses. J. Anim. Sci., 85: 2413-2422.Direct Link |
Calegare, L., M.M. Alencar, I.U. Packer, P.R. Leme, C.L. Ferrell and D.P.D. Lanna, 2009. Preweaning performance and body composition of calves from straightbred Nellore and Bos taurus
x Nellore crosses. J. Anim. Sci., 87: 1814-1820.Direct Link |
Di Constanzo, A., J.C. Meiske and S.D. Plegge, 1991. Characterization of energetically efficient and inefficient beef cows. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 1337-1348.Direct Link |
Di Costanzo, A., J.C. Meiske, S.D. Plegge, T.M. Peters and R.D. Goodrich, 1990. Within-herd variation in energy utilization for maintenance and gain of beef cows. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 2156-2165.Direct Link |
Ferrell, C.L. and T.G. Jenkins, 1984. A note on energy requirements for maintenance of lean and fat Angus, Hereford and Simmental cows. Anim. Prod., 39: 305-309.
Ferrell, C.L. and T.G. Jenkins, 1984. Energy utilization by mature, nonpregnant, nonlactating cows of different types. J. Anim. Sci., 58: 234-243.Direct Link |
Ferrell, C.L. and T.G. Jenkins, 1985. Cow type and the nutritional environment: Nutritional aspects. J. Anim. Sci., 61: 725-741.Direct Link |
Ferrell, C.L. and T.G. Jenkins, 1998. Body composition and energy utilization by steers of diverse genotypes fed a high-concentrate diet during the finishing period: I. Angus, Belgian Blue, Hereford and Piedmontese sires. J. Anim. Sci., 76: 637-646.Direct Link |
Ferrell, C.L. and T.G. Jenkins, 1998. Body composition and energy utilization by steers of diverse genotypes fed a high-concentrate diet during the finishing period: II. Angus, Boran, Brahman, Hereford and Tuli sires. J. Anim. Sci., 76: 647-657.Direct Link |
Ferrell, C.L., T.G. Jenkins and H.C. Freetly, 2005. Feed Utilization and Performance of Crossbred Tropically Adapted Cattle. Meat Animal Research Centre, USA.
Fox, D.G., L.O. Tedeschi and M.J. Baker, 2002. Determining pot-weaning feed efficiency in beef cattle. Proceedings of the Beef Improvement Federation 34th Annual Metting, July 10-13, Omaha, NE. USA., pp: 44-66.
Galyean, M.L., 1980. Laboratory Procedires in Animal Nutrition Research. Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, pp: 193.
Garcia, M., 1981. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificaci�n Climatica de Koeppen. 2nd Edn., Universidad Nacional Aut�noma de M�xico, Mexico.
Green, R.D., L.V. Cundiff and G.E. Dickerson, 1991. Life-Cycle biological efficiency of Bos theindicus
x Bos taurus
crossbred cow-calf production to weaning. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 3544-3563.
Green, R.D., L.V. Cundiff, G.E. Dickerson and T.G. Jenkins, 1991. Output/input differences among nonpregnant, lactating Bos indicus-Bos taurus
and Bos taurus-Bos taurus
F1 cross cows. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 3156-3166.Direct Link |
Howes, J.R., J.F. Hentges and G.K. Davis, 1963. Comparative digestive powers of Hereford and Brahman cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 22: 22-26.Direct Link |
Jenkins, T.G., C.L. Ferrel and L.V. Cundiff, 1986. Relationships of components of the body among mature cows as related to size, lactational potential and possible effects on productivity. Anim. Prod., 43: 245-254.
Johnson, D.E., C.L. Ferrell and T.G. Jenkins, 2003. The history of energetic efficiency research: Where have we been and where are we going. J. Anim. Sci., 81: 27-38.Direct Link |
Kennedy, P.M., 1982. Ruminal and intestinal digestion in Brahman crossbred and Hereford cattle fed alfalfa or tropical pasture hay. J. Anim. Sci., 55: 1190-1199.Direct Link |
Minson, J.D., 1980. Nutritional Differences Between Tropical and Temperate Pastures. In: Grazing Animals, Morley, F.H.W. (Ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp: 143-157.
Monta�o, B.M. and M. Nielsen, 1990. Biological efficiency to weaning and to slaughter of crossbred beef cattle with different genetic potential for milk. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 2297-2297.Direct Link |
Monta�o, B.M. and M.K. Nielsen, 1990. Reproductive performance and variation in body weight during annual cycles for crossbred beef cows with different genetic potential for milk. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 2289-2296.Direct Link |
Monta�o, B.M., M.K. Nielsen and G.H. Deutscher, 1990. Energy requirements for maintenance of crossbreed beef cattle with different genetic potential fro milk. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 2279-2288.Direct Link |
Moore, R.L., H.W. Essig and L.J. Smithson, 1975. Influence of breeds of beef cattle on ration utilization. J. Anim. Sci., 41: 203-207.Direct Link |
NRC, 2000. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th Edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC., USA.
Owens, F.A., D.R. Gill, D.S. Secrist and S.W. Coleman, 1995. Review of some aspects of growth and development of feetlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 73: 3152-3172.Direct Link |
Pichard, G., O. Rosero, M.L. Kass and F. Ojeda, 1992. Recommendations for Sampling and Chemical Analysis. Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture, San Jos�, Costa Rica.
Reynoso, C.O., D.G. Fox, R.W. Blake, M.C. Barry and L.O. Tedeschi et al
., 2004. Predicting nutritional requirements and lactation performance of dual-purpose cows using a dynamic model. Agric. Syst., 80: 67-83.
Rueda, B.L., R.W. Blake, C.F. Nicholson, D.G. Fox and L.O. Tedeschi et al
., 2003. Production and economic potentials of cattle in pasture-based systems of the Western Amazon region of Brasil. J. Anim. Sci., 81: 2923-2937.Direct Link |
Solis, J.C., F.M. Byers, G.T. Schelling, C.R. Long and L.W. Greene, 1988. Maintenance requirements and energetic efficiency of cows of different breed types. J. Anim. Sci., 66: 764-773.Direct Link |
Tedeschi, L.Q., C. Boin, D.G. Fox, P.R. Leme, G.F. Alleonis and D.P.D. Lanna, 2002. Energy requirement for maintenance and growth of Nellore bulls and steers fed high-forage diets. J. Anim. Sci., 80: 1671-1682.Direct Link |
Tejada de Hern�ndez, I., 1983. Manual de laboratorio para an�lisis de ingredientes utilizados en la alimentaci�n animal. Instituto Nacional de Investiga��o Pesqueira.
Thonney, M.L., D.J. Duhaime, P.W. Moe and J.T. Reid, 1979. Acid insoluble ash and permanganate lignin as indicators to determine digestibility of cattle rations. J. Anim. Sci., 49: 1112-1116.Direct Link |
Van Keulen, J. and B.A. Young, 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 282-287.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Williams, C.B. and T.G. Jenkins, 2003. A dynamic model of metabolizable energy utilization in growing and mature cattle. I. Metabolizable energy utilization for maintenance and support metabolism. J. Anim. Sci., 81: 1371-1381.Direct Link |
Williams, C.B. and T.G. Jenkins, 2003. A dynamic model of metabolizable energy utilization in growing and mature cattle. II. Metabolizable energy utilization for gain. J. Anim. Sci., 81: 1382-1389.Direct Link |