Research Journal of Applied Sciences
Year:
2013
Volume:
8
Issue:
9
Page No.
456 - 460
References
Ahmad, M., 2009. Freedom of speech and the internet: A case study of Malaysia. Malayan Law J., Vol. 3
Bari, A.A., 2004. The evolution of Malaysian constitution tradition in the role of law in developing Asia. Proceedings of the Asian Law Institute Inaugural Conference, May 27-28, 2004, Bangkok, Thailand -.
Chew, S.Y., 2001. Contempt of court: Freedom of expression and rights of the accused. Proceedings of the 11th Malaysian Law Conference, November 8-10, 2001, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia -.
Cleaver, C., 1993. Ruling without reasons: Contempt of court and the sub judice rule. South Afr. Law J., 110: 530-534.
Farrell, E.J., 1994. Sub judice contempt: Justice done or merely seen to be done. Irish Student Law Rev., 4: 85-96.
Goodroad, S.L., 1998. The challenge of free speech: Asian values v. unfettered free speech, an analysis of Singapore and Malaysia in the new global order. Indiana Int. Comp. Law Rev., 9: 259-318.
Ibrahim, Z., 2001. Contempt of court-freedom of expression and rights of the accused. Proceedings of the 11th Malaysian Law Conference, November 8-10, 2001, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia -.
Lee, J.T.T., 2009. Freedom of speech and contempt by scandalizing the court in Singapore. Proceedings of the International Association of Law Schools (IALS) Conference on Constitutional Law, September 11-12, 2009, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 1-13.
Lockhart, J., 1987. Contempt of court: The sub judice rule. Univ. New South Wales Law J., 10: 1-7.
Riefkohl, A., 1996. Prior restraints on the media and the right to a fair trial: A proposal for a new standard. Kentucky Law J., 84: 259-259.
Segal, B.G., 1969. Administration of justice. Mississippi Law J., 40: 461-461.
Shameem, N., 2004. Contempt of court. Attorney-General's Conference, December 2004. http://lawfiji.com/speeches/contempt-of-court/.
Tilford, R.J., 2002. S. v. Mamabolo: Post-trial speech in post-apartheid South Africa. Tulane J. Int. Comp. Law, 10: 445-445.
Van Niekerk, B., 1981. Premises of a democratic system of free speech concerning the administration of justice: A comparative overview. J. Legal Prof., 6: 87-87.