References

Al-Khanjari, Z., K. Al-Kindi, A. Al-Zidi and Y. Baghdadi, 2014. M-Learning: The new horizon of learning at SQU. J. Eng. Res., 11: 15-26.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Al-Khanjari, Z., Z. Al-Kindi, E. Al-Kindi and N. Kraiem, 2015. Developing educational mobile application architecture using SOA. Int. J. Multimedia Ubiquitous Eng., 10: 247-254.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Alharbi, S. and S. Drew, 2014. Mobile learning-system usage: An integrated framework to measure students behavioural intention. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Science and Information, August 27-29, 2014, IEEE, London, UK., pp: 906-911.

Almatari, A.Y., N.A. Iahad and A.S. Balaid, 2013. Factors influencing students intention to use M-learning. J. Inf. Syst. Res. Innovation, Vol. 5, No. 1.

Amhag, L., 2015. Learner centered experiences with flipped classroom and mobile online webinars in distance higher education program. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile Learning (IADIS’15), March 14-16, 2015, Madeira, Portugal, pp: 99-103.

Arrigo, M., G. Fulantelli and D. Taibi, 2015. Challenges of using learning analytics techniques to support mobile learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Learning, March 14-16, 2015, Maderia, Portugal, pp: 147-149.

Baharom, S., 2013. Designing mobile learning activities in the Malaysian HE context: A social constructivist approach. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, England.

Baporikar, N. and I.A. Shah, 2012. Quality of higher education in 21st century-A case of Oman. J. Educ. Instructional Stud. World, 2: 9-18.
Direct Link  |  

Bozdogan, A.E. and M. Uzoglu, 2012. The development of a scale of attitudes toward tablet PC. Mevlana Int. J. Educ., 2: 85-95.
Direct Link  |  

Cochran, W.G., 2007. Sampling Techniques. 3rd Edn., Wiley India Private Ltd., New Delhi, India, ISBN-13: 978-8126515240,.

Eslampour, H., M. Joshi, S. Park, H. Shin and J. Chung, 2013. Advancements in Package-on-Package (PoP) technology, delivering performance, form factor & cost benefits in next generation smartphone processors. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 63rd International Conference on Electronic Components and Technology, May 28-31, 2013, IEEE, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA., pp: 1823-1828.

Frazier, S.D., 2013. An analysis of the current use and intentions to use mobile learning strategies among full-time community college faculty. Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.

Gao, C., A. Gutierrez, M. Rajan, R.G. Dreslinski, T. Mudge and C.J. Wu, 2015. A study of mobile device utilization. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS’15), March 29-31, 2015, IEEE, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA., pp: 225-234.

Hassan, M.H., F. Alhosban and M.A. Hourani, 2016. Using mobile technologies for enhancing student academic experience: University of Jordan case study. Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., 10: 13-18.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Hochstrasser, J.L., 2014. The use of technology for enhancing the learning experiences of undergraduate students: From online education to the use of mobile devices and web-based programs. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.

ISTE., 2007. ISTE standards for students. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), Eugene, Oregon, USA. https://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students/nets-student-standards-2007

Kurilovas, E., 2014. Research on tablets application for mobile learning activities. J. Mob. Multimedia, 10: 182-193.
Direct Link  |  

Kurkovsky, S., 2013. Mobile computing and robotics in one course: Why not?. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '13), July 01-03, 2013, ACM, Canterbury, England, UK, pp: 64-69.

Liaw, S.S. and H.M. Huang, 2011. Exploring Learner’s Acceptance Toward Mobile Learning. In: Technology Acceptance in Education: Research and Issues, Teo, T. (Ed.). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands, ISBN-13: 978-9460914850, pp: 145-157.

Liu, M., C. Navarrete, E. Maradiegue and J. Wivagg, 2014. Mobile learning and English language learners: A case study of using iPod touch as a teaching and learning tool. J. Interact. Learn. Res., 25: 373-403.
Direct Link  |  

Mosley, V.V., 2012. Technology adoption in K-12 education: A qualitative study using TAM3 to explore why technology is underutilized. Ph.D. Thesis, Capella University, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Oyelere, S.S., J. Suhonen and E. Sutinen, 2016. M-learning: A new paradigm of learning ICT in Nigeria. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol., 10: 35-44.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Passey, D. and J. Zozimo, 2015. Mobile learning and teacher education: Researching MLearn pilot development. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile Learning, March 14-16, 2015, Madeira, Portugal, pp: 62-69.

Saraubon, K., P. Nilsook and P. Wannapiroon, 2016. System design of mobile augmented book. Int. J. Interact. Mobile Technol., 10: 52-59.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sarrab, M. and L. Elgamel, 2013. Contextual M-learning system for higher education providers in Oman. World Applied Sci. J., 22: 1412-1419.
Direct Link  |  

Sarrab, M., 2015. M-learning in education: Omani undergraduate students perspective. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 176: 834-839.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sung, H.N., D.Y. Jeong, Y.S. Jeong and J.I. Shin, 2015. The relationship among self-efficacy, social influence, performance expectancy, effort expectancy and behavioral intention in mobile learning service. Int. J. U. E. Serv. Sci. Technol., 8: 197-206.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sung, Y.T., K.E. Chang and T.C. Liu, 2016. The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on student’s learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Comput. Educ., 94: 252-275.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Tagoe, M.A. and E. Abakah, 2014. Determining distance education student’s readiness for mobile learning at University of Ghana using the theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Educ. Dev. Inf. Commun. Technol., 10: 91-106.
Direct Link  |