The Social Sciences

Year: 2016
Volume: 11
Issue: 8
Page No. 1459 - 1465

The Question of the Ratio of the Category “Conflict” and “Dispute” in the Procedural Law

Authors : Tatyana Valerievna Isakova and Darima Andreevna Shandibaeva

References

Bernard, J., 1950. Where is the modern sociology of conflict?. Am. J. Sociology, 56: 11-16.
Direct Link  |  

Burton, J., 1969. Conflict and Communication: The Use of Controlled Communication in International Relations. Free Press, Michigan, USA., Pages: 246.

Coser, L., 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. Manchester University Press, New York, USA., Pages: 133.

Coser, L.A., 1954. Toward sociology of social conflict. Ph.D. Thesis, Columbia University, New York, USA.

Darendorf, R., 1994. Elements of the theory of the social conflict. Sotsis., 5: 24-29.

Fisher, R.J., 1972. Third party consultation: A method for the study and resolution of conflict. J. Conflict Resolut., 16: 67-94.
Direct Link  |  

Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

Kriesberg, L., 1973. The Sociology of Social Conflict. Pren-tice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ., Pages: 300.

Pants, A.I., 1994. A criminal trial in the system of division of the authorities. Bull. Moscow Univ., 5: 55-57.

Pavlushina, A.A., 2002. Dispute as the basic category of the theory of jurisdictional process. Arbitration Civil Proc., 7: 3-7.

Rozhkova, M.A., 2005. The concept of dispute on civil law. Mag. Russian Law, 4: 98-103.

Vinnytsia, L., 1999. To balance the rights of the parties in criminal trial. Russian Justice, 6: 43-44.

Zaytsev, I.M., 1974. The Essence of Economic Disputes. Publishing House of the Saratov University, Saratov, Russia, Pages: 157.

Zelentsov, A.B., 2000. Administrative and legal dispute: Theoretic-methodological approaches to research. Jurisprudence, 1: 68-79.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved