References

Al-Jazairy, Y.H. and A. Nlouka, 1999. Effect of bonded amalgam restorations on microleakage. Operative Dentistry, 24: 203-209.

Al-Negrish, A.R., 2001. Reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Jordan. Int. Dent. J., 51: 109-115.

Altun, C., 2005. Kompozit dolgu materyallerinde son gelismeler. Gulhane Tip Derg, 47: 77-82.

Bernabe, P.F.E., R. Holland, R. Morandi, V. Souze and M.J. Nery et al., 2005. Comparative study of MTA and other materials in retrofilling of pulpless dogs teeth. Braz. Dent. J., 16: 149-155.

Cobb, D.S., K.M. Macgregor, M.A. Vargas and G.E. Denehy, 2000. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison. J. Am. Dental Assoc., 131: 1610-1615.

Dogan, S.K., M.C. Dogan and O. Yoldas, 2006. Farkli restorasyon teknikleri uygulanmis endodontik tedavili kesicilerin kirilma dayanimi. Cumhuriyet Univ. Dis. Hek. Fak. Derg., 9: 32-36.

Dupont, G.A., 2000. Modern Restorative Materials for Veterinary Dentistry. In: Recent Advances in Small Animal Dentistry, Carmichael, D.T. (Ed.). International Veterinary Information Service, New York.

Forsten, L. and S. Karjalainen, 1990. Glass ionomers in proximal cavities of primary molars. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 98: 70-73.

Foster, L.V., 1994. Validity of clinical judgements for the presence of secondary caries associated with defective amalgam restorations. Br. Dent. J., 177: 89-93.

Fuks, A.B., J. Shapira and S. Bielak, 1984. Clinical evaluation of a glass-ionomer cement used as class II restorative material in primary molars. J. Pedodont, 8: 393-399.

Gorgul, O.S., M. Kaya, S. Kanik, A. Topal and A. Altikardesler, 2001. Kopeklerde restoratif ve endodontik cerrahi uygulamalar. Vet. Cerrahi Derg., 7: 48-59.

Gundogdu, N. and Z. Kirzioglu, 1998. Sut dislerinde farkli tekniklerle uygulanan resterasyonlarin klinik basarisi. Ataturk Univ. Dis Hek. Fak. Derg., 8: 17-25.

Haller, B., 2000. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am. J. Dent., 13: 44-50.

Helvatjoglou-Antoniades, M., S. Theodoridou-Pahini, Y. Papadogiannis and A. Karezis, 2000. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations. Effect thermal cycl. Operative Dentistry, 25: 316-323.

Hurmuzlu, F., A. Herguner, S. Siso and D. Isin, 2004. Yeni jenerasyon dentin bonding ajanlarin amalgam retorasyonlarinda marjinal sizintiya etkisi. Cumhuriyet Univ. Dis. Hek. Fak. Derg., 7: 22-26.

Kanca, J., 1992. Resin bonding to wet substrate 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int., 23: 39-41.

Kidd, E.M., 1989. Caries diagnosis within restored teeth. Oper. Dent. J., 14: 149-152.

Macpherson, L.C. and B.G. Smith, 1995. Reinforcement of weakened cusps by adhesive restorative materials: An in vitro study. Br. Dent. J., 178: 342-344.

Magne, P. and W.H. Douglas, 1999. Rationalization of esthetic restorative dentistry based on biomimetics. J. Esthet. Dent., 11: 5-15.

Magne, P., A. Versluis and W.H. Douglas, 1999. Rationalization of incisor shape: Experimental-merical analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent., 81: 345-355.

Manhart, J., H.Y. Chen and R. Hickel, 2001. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 132: 639-645.

Matis, B.A., M.J. Cochran, T.J. Carlson, C. Guba and G. Eckert, 2004. A 3 years clinical evaluation of two dentin bonding agents. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 135: 451-457.

McLean, J.W., 1992. The clinical use of glass-ionomer cements. Dent. Clin. North Am., 36: 693-711.
PubMed  |  

Mjor, I.A., C. Shen, Eliasson, S.T. and S. Richter, 2002. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper. Dent., 27: 117-123.
PubMed  |  

Mount, G.J., 1995. Some physical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement. Int. Dent. J., 45: 135-140.
PubMed  |  

Nalcaci, A. and N. Ulusoy, 2005. Farkli polismerizasyon zamanlarinin kondanse edilebilir kompozit rezinlerin yuzey sertligi uzerine etkileri. Ankara Univ. Dis Hek. Fak. Derg., 32: 79-84.

Rudolphy, M.P., Y. Gorter, C. van Loveren and J.P. van Amerongen, 1997. Validity of radiographs for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations in vitro. Caries Res., 31: 24-29.
PubMed  |  

Samsar, E. and F. Akin, 2000. Restoratif Metaryaller: Veteriner Ozel Cerrahi. Medipres Maatbacilik, Amasya, Turkiye, pp: 117-125.

Schulze, K.A., S.J. Marshall, S.A. Gansky and G.W. Marshall, 2003. Colour stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging. Dent. Mater., 19: 612-619.
Direct Link  |  

Sedgley, C.M. and H.H. Messer, 1992. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J. Endodont., 18: 332-335.
PubMed  |  

Swift, E.J., J. Perdigao, A.D. Wilder, H.O. Heymann, J.R. Sturdevant and S.C. Bayne, 2001. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 132: 1117-1123.
PubMed  |  

Swift, E.J., K.N. May and S. Mitchell, 2001. Clinical eveluation of prime and bond 2.1 for treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Am. J. Dent., 14: 13-16.
PubMed  |  

Tanomaru-Filho, M., M.R. Luis, M.R. Leonardo, J.M.G. Tanomaru and L.A.B. Silva, 2006. Evaluation of periapical repair following retrograde filling with different root-end filling materials in dog teeth with periapical lesions. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol., 102: 127-132.
Direct Link  |  

Toraman, M., I. Celik and O. Bala, 2004. Amalgam restorasyonlarin degistirilme nedenlerinin In vivo olarak arastirilmasi. Turk. Klin. Dis Hek. Bil., 10: 22-27.
Direct Link  |  

Turkun, L.S., 2002. Self Etching ve tek sise adeziv sitemlerin 6 yillik klinik degerlendirmesi. Ege Univ. Dis. Hek. Fak. Derg., 23: 123-130.

Wilkie, R., A. Lidums and R. Smales, 1996. Class II glass ionomer cement tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent., 20: 179-181.