Authors : Mega Suwardini, Muhari and Suhanadji
Abstract: This study aims to determine the application of cooperative learning model with the type of talking stick in an effort to improve the activity and learning outcomes on the theme of various fourth grade work SDN Manukan Kulon III/540 Surabaya. The application of cooperative learning model of talking stick makes the students interested, creates a pleasant atmosphere, keeps students active, encourages students ‘courage in expressing their opinions and fosters student’s sense of confidence so as to influence student activity improvement and learning outcomes. This research is a Classroom Action Research (CAR) by using Kemmis Taggart model of cycle cycles (spiral) which includes 4 stages, namely: planning, action, observation and reflection. The research data was obtained from the observation and the test. The research was conducted in 3 cycles. The result of the research showed that in cycle 2 reached 67.3%, this result has not fulfilled the expected success indicator that is in accordance with the criteria of drinking drink which reach 75% and the classical reach 80%. In the learning process is known to still be many obstacles. In cycle 2 by making improvements to the design of learning or in implementing the learning process, the results obtained reached 77.3%, also has not met the expected success indicators. Furthermore, the researchers continue the learning in cycle 3. The results in cycle 3 reached 86.0% and has met the expected success indicator that is in accordance with the criteria minimum ability reached 75% and classical reach 80%. Based on the result of the research, it can be concluded that Application of Cooperative Learning Model Talking Stick Type can Increase Student Activity and Learning Outcome on Theme of Various Work of Class IV SDN Manukan Kulon III/540 Surabaya.
Mega Suwardini, Muhari and Suhanadji , 2020. The Cooperative Learning Model Talking Stick Type in Improving Student Activities and Results on Theme Various Occupations. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 17: 117-123.